🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of states are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this global discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states internationally are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.